This is very cutting edge stuff, and I feel that I don't understand it
completely or explain it as clearly as it could be by someone wiser and
more experienced than myself, but here is my best effort, as of
8/6/01. Be sure and look over the references at the bottom of this
page, and the "See also:" links, above.
The major discovery is that the
classic opioids like morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, and Dilaudid
(hydromorphone)
break down into metabolites that are 'hyperalgesic', that is, molecules that
can actually cause pain when they accumulate under conditions of chronic
administration.
This might explain the experience of switching to more and
more potent opioids which in turn produce more and more hyperalgesic molecules, and so a vicious cycle develops.
Methadone is different. It breaks down to methadone which is not a
hyperalgesic substance.
The next part is non-intuitive: the higher the dose of the
chronically taken opioid, the more
relatively potent the methadone is when you rotate to it.
If you were to calculate the equianalgesic dose of
methadone using the usual conversion tables, you will massively
overdose the patient. Therefore, in an opioid rotation to
methadone you calculate the equianalgesic dose and divide by
three, usually, or at least by two.
So in the rotation, you are losing a lot of
opioid tonnage. You also
have to be very careful during the first week on methadone
as it accumulates in the body. So if a person is rotated to methadone at
an appropriate dose and is experiencing pain
on day two, the correct thing to do would be to observed the patient for a
few more days before raising the dose of methadone, and as the drug accumulates he will
perhaps become pain free. If, after an appropriate rotation procedure, the person is showing signs of
sedation, fatigue and grogginess, the dose of methadone might have to be decreased over the first
week.
It's more simple than it sounds. In the case of a man with intractable
headaches for 31 years(!) who had been referred to me by his headache specialist
for detoxification to rule out opiate rebound as the etiology of headache, I
did, after a long time, manage to get him from fentanyl 75 patch to the
fentanyl 50 patch and using less breakthrough dilaudid, but his
pain was still 8-9 every day.
This was unacceptable. After phone consultation with three pain
specialists, and review of several articles they recommended, I
discontinued the fentanyl and rotated the patient to methadone at a little
more than 1/3 of the dose indicated by equianalgesic conversion tables.
After rotation he ended up on 10 mg methadone 5 times per day with
headache pain down to 3-4 (!!!) and only occasional need for breakthrough
meds. I tried to 'go for the gold' and
raised his methadone to 15mg 5 times per day, the headache pain was
essentially eliminated, but at the expense of severe fatigue and
nodding. Adding Adderall (amphetamine) to the regimen at 40mg daily in 3
divided doses gave relief from the
fatigue which allowed the patient to tolerate the higher and more
effective methadone dose.
Amphetamine
also has analgesic properties of it's own and is synergistic
with opioid analgesia (1+1=3) so this is a rational
regimen. (see References below.) This patient ended up requiring
zero breakthrough medication beyond "a couple of Excedrin,
but not every day."
In two other patients, who were doing well on high dose
MS-Contin and Oxy-Contin, I did the rotation to methadone
because it is so much less expensive. They are also doing fine
on methadone, although one now requires the fentanyl lollipop (Actiq -
oral transmucosal fentanyl) as
a breakthrough medication. The other
patient is on lower doses of methadone and is using dilaudid as
a breakthrough medication successfully.
References:
The first three references are from the syllabus of the American
Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM)
conference Pain and Addiction: Common Threads II, in Los
Angeles, 4/2001. Course Co-Directors: Howard Heit, M.D., FACP,
FASAM and Seddon Savage, M.D., FASAM. This syllabus is probably
available from ASAM. The main ASAM office phone number is: 301-656-3920.
1) "Incomplete cross tolerance and
multiple mu opioid peptide receptors"
Gavril W. Pasternak published in
Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, Vol. 22, No 2, Feb 2001
This article presents the underlying theoretical of
incomplete cross tolerance on which the practice of opioid
rotation to methadone is based. This is dense and difficult to
understand material; I keep rereading it and I still can't
complete get it.
But, the next reference is the nuts and bolts of opiate
rotation:
2) "Dose Ratio between Morphine and Methadone in
Patients with Cancer Pain"
Lawlor, Turner, Hanson,
and Bruera in Cancer 1998;82;1167-73
Conclusion: "The results highlight the general
underestimation of methadone potency and the consequent risk of
potential life-threatening toxicity. The strongly positive
correlation between dose ratio and previous morphine dose
suggests the need for a highly individualized and cautious
approach when rotating from morphine to methadone in patients
with cancer pain."
For more on this same subject:
3) "Equianalgesic dose/ratio between methadone and other
opioid agonists in cancer pain: Comparison of two clinical
experiences."
Ripamonti, DeCono, Groff, Belzile,
Pereira, Hanson, and Bruera in Annals of Oncology 9;79-83;1998
"Results: The results of this retrospective study
suggest that:
1) methadone is much more potent than previously described in
the literature, and
2) the dose ratio between hydromorphone (dilaudid) and
methadone is higher than as suggested by equianalgesic tables,
and
3) the ratio correlates with total opioid dose administered
before switching."
Conclusions: "The fact that methadone ratio is
different according to the opioid dose used previously should be
taken into careful consideration by the clinician in order to
avoid severe toxicity or death during switchover. Prospective
studies should be carried out in order to better define our
findings."
4)
"Opioid-NMDA receptor interactions may clarify
conditioned (associative) components of opioid analgesic tolerance"
Bespalov AY, Zvartau EE, Beardsley PM;
Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2001 Jun ;25(4):343-353
ABSTRACT - Recent evidence suggests that acute administration of opioid
analgesic drugs (such as morphine or heroin) produces delayed
hyperalgesia. This hyperalgesic response is likely to result from
hyperactivation of NMDA receptors triggered by stimulation of opioid
receptors and may mediate acute tolerance. In support of this
hypothesis, blockade of NMDA receptors attenuates opioid-induced delayed
hyperalgesia and prolongs the duration of antinociceptive activity of
morphine. Furthermore, the NMDA receptor-induced hyperalgesia is likely
an unconditioned response to opioid receptor stimulation that becomes
spatiotemporally associated with environmental cues accompanying
repeated opioid exposure. This hypothesis conforms to the traditional
Pavlovian requirement for conditioned and unconditioned responses to be
qualitatively similar. In support of the role of NMDA receptor
hyperactivation in morphine tolerance, NMDA receptor antagonists have
been shown to block development of analgesic tolerance induced by
repeated exposures to morphine. The view of the conditioned nature of
opioid tolerance may be significantly extended by assuming that upon
repeated drug administration an early-onset effect of a drug may become
a predictive stimulus for a later-onset effect and, consequentially, it
may become empowered to elicit the later-onset effect itself. Such
'intra-drug' conditioning hypothesis is well in line with the current
experimental evidence but further studies will be needed to verify it
directly
5) "Methadone maintenance patients are cross-tolerant to the
antinociceptive effects of morphine"
Doverty M, Somogyi AA, White JM, Bochner F, Beare CH, Menelaou A, Ling
W; Pain 2001 Aug ;93(2):155-163
ABSTRACT - We have previously shown that methadone maintenance patients
are hyperalgesic. Very little is known about the antinociceptive effects
of additional opioids in these patients. This study (1) compared the
intensity and duration of antinociceptive responses, at two pseudo-
steady-state plasma morphine concentrations (C(SS1) and C(SS2)), between
four patients on stable, once daily, doses of methadone and four matched
control subjects; and (2) determined, in methadone patients, whether the
antinociceptive effects of morphine are affected by changes in plasma
R(-)-methadone concentration that occur during an inter-dosing interval.
Two types of nociceptive stimuli were used: (1) a cold pressor test
(CP), (2) electrical stimulation (ES). Morphine was administered
intravenously to achieve the two consecutive plasma concentrations.
Blood samples were collected, concurrently with nociceptive responses,
to determine plasma morphine concentrations. Methadone patients achieved
mean C(SS1) and C(SS2) of 16 and 55 ng/ml respectively; those of
controls were 11 and 33 ng/ml. Methadone patients were hyperalgesic to
pain induced by CP but not ES. Despite significantly greater plasma
morphine concentrations, methadone patients experienced minimal
antinociception in comparison with controls. Furthermore in methadone
patients, the antinociception ceased when the infusion ended. In
comparison, the duration of effect in control subjects was 3 h. The
fluctuations that occurred in plasma R(-)- methadone concentration
during an inter-dosing interval had little effect on patients' responses
to morphine. Our findings suggest that methadone patients are
cross-tolerant to the antinociceptive effects of morphine, and
conventional doses of morphine are likely to be ineffective in managing
episodes of acute pain amongst this patient group. Further research is
needed to determine whether other drugs are more effective than morphine
in managing acute pain in this patient population
6) "Pain intolerance in opioid-maintained former opiate addicts: effect of
long-acting maintenance agent"
Compton P, Charuvastra VC, Ling W; Drug Alcohol Depend 2001 Jul 1
;63(2):139-146
ABSTRACT - Patients on methadone maintenance therapy are relatively
intolerant of pain, a finding hypothesized to reflect a hyperalgesic
state induced by chronic opioid administration. To explore if the
intrinsic activity of the opioid maintenance agent might affect
expression of hyperalgesia in this population, withdrawal latency for
cold-pressor (CP) pain was compared between small groups of
methadone-maintained (n = 18), buprenorphine-maintained (n = 18), and
matched control (n = 18) subjects. The opioid-maintained groups had
equal and significantly shorter withdrawal latencies than controls,
however it is possible that high rates of continued illicit opioid use
precluded finding differences between methadone and buprenorphine
groups. Differential effects of maintenance agent were found for the few
subjects without illicit opioid use, such that withdrawal latencies for
methadone- maintained (n = 5) were less than for
buprenorphine-maintained (n = 7) which were less than controls (n = 18).
Diminished pain tolerance in patients receiving opioid maintenance
treatment has significant clinical implications. More research is needed
to determine if buprenorphine offers advantages over methadone in this
regard
8)
"Psychostimulants as Adjuvant Analgesics"
Eduardo Bruera and Sharon Watanabe;
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management; 9(6); 412-415; 1994.
http://www.doctordeluca.com/Library/Pain/RolePsychStimPain.htm
[END]
|