1

UI  - 2

TI  - Public policy statement on opioid antagonist agent detoxification under sedation or anesthesia (OADUSA) [In Process Citation]

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 20560009LA - EngDA - 20001206IS - 1055-0887SB - MCY - UNITED STATESJC - A0YRO - O:099

UR  - PM:0011110069

SO  - J Addict Dis 2000  ;19(4):109-112

 

2

UI  - 18

AU  - Brewer C

AU  - Maksoud NA

TI  - Opiate detoxification under anesthesia [letter; comment]

MH  - adverse effects

MH  - Anesthesia

MH  - Anesthesia,General

MH  - Human

MH  - Naltrexone

MH  - Narcotic Antagonists

MH  - Narcotics

MH  - Opioid-Related Disorders

MH  - prevention & control

MH  - Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

MH  - therapeutic use

MH  - therapy

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 98001622LA - EngRN - 0 (Narcotic Antagonists)RN - 0 (Narcotics)RN - 16590-41-3 (Naltrexone)PT - COMMENTPT - LETTERDA - 19971106IS - 0098-7484SB - ASB - MSB - XCY - UNITED STATESJC - KFREM - 199801RO - M:LC2

UR  - PM:0009343457

SO  - JAMA 1997 Oct 22 ;278(16):1318

 

3

UI  - 15

AU  - Gevirtz C

AU  - Subhedar DV

AU  - Choi CS

TI  - Catecholamine surge in opioid-addicted patients undergoing detoxification under general anesthesia [letter; comment]

MH  - Adrenergic alpha-Agonists

MH  - Anesthesia

MH  - Anesthesia,General

MH  - blood

MH  - Catecholamines

MH  - Clonidine

MH  - Human

MH  - Naloxone

MH  - Narcotic Antagonists

MH  - Opioid-Related Disorders

MH  - therapeutic use

MH  - therapy

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 99112562LA - EngRN - 0 (Adrenergic alpha-Agonists)RN - 0 (Catecholamines)RN - 0 (Narcotic Antagonists)RN - 4205-90-7 (Clonidine)RN - 465-65-6 (Naloxone)PT - COMMENTPT - LETTERDA - 19990204IS - 0003-3022SB - ASB - MCY - UNITED STATESJC - 4SGEM - 199904RO - M:LC2

UR  - PM:0009915356

SO  - Anesthesiology 1999 Jan ;90(1):334-335

 

4

UI  - 9

AU  - Gold CG

AU  - Cullen DJ

AU  - Gonzales S

AU  - Houtmeyers D

AU  - Dwyer MJ

AD  - Department of Anesthesiology and the St. Elizabeth's Comprehensive Addiction Program, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02135-2997, USA. cgold@tiac.net

TI  - Rapid opioid detoxification during general anesthesia: a review of 20 patients [see comments]

AB  - BACKGROUND: Opioid addiction therapy includes successful detoxification, rehabilitation, and sometimes methadone maintenance. However, the patient may have physical, mental, and emotional pain while trying to achieve abstinence. A new detoxification technique that incorporates general anesthesia uses a high-dose opioid antagonist to compress detoxification to within 6 h while avoiding the withdrawal. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval and detailed informed consent, 20 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-II, addicted to various opioids underwent anesthesia-assisted rapid opioid detoxification. After baseline hemodynamics and withdrawal scores were obtained, anesthesia was induced. After testing with 0.4 mg intravenous naloxone, 4 mg nalmefene, was infused over 2 to 3 h. After emergence, severity of withdrawal was scored before and after administration of 0.4 mg intravenous naloxone. After 24 h, patients began outpatient follow-up treatment while taking oral naltrexone. RESULTS: All 20 patients were successfully detoxified with no adverse anesthetic events. After the first post-treatment test dose of 0.4 mg naloxone, 13 of 20 patients had no signs of withdrawal and hemodynamic changes were minimal. Withdrawal scores were always very low and similar before and after detoxification. Three of 17 patients (18%) available for follow-up have remained abstinent from opioids since treatment (< or = 18 months). Four other patients are clean after brief relapses. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia-assisted opioid detoxification is an alternative to conventional detoxification

MH  - Adult

MH  - adverse effects

MH  - analogs & derivatives

MH  - Anesthesia,General

MH  - Combined Modality Therapy

MH  - drug therapy

MH  - Female

MH  - Human

MH  - Male

MH  - Methadone

MH  - methods

MH  - Middle Age

MH  - Monitoring,Physiologic

MH  - Naloxone

MH  - Naltrexone

MH  - Narcotic Antagonists

MH  - Opioid-Related Disorders

MH  - prevention & control

MH  - rehabilitation

MH  - Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

MH  - Support,Non-U.S.Gov't

MH  - therapeutic use

MH  - therapy

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 20065664LA - EngRN - 0 (Narcotic Antagonists)RN - 16590-41-3 (Naltrexone)RN - 465-65-6 (Naloxone)RN - 55096-26-9 (nalmefene)PT - CLINICAL TRIALPT - JOURNAL ARTICLEDA - 19991230IS - 0003-3022SB - ASB - MCY - UNITED STATESJC - 4SGAA - AuthorEM - 200003RO - M:LC1

UR  - PM:0010598605

SO  - Anesthesiology 1999 Dec ;91(6):1639-1647

 

5

UI  - 12

AU  - Hensel M

AU  - Volk T

AU  - Kox WJ

AD  - Klinik fur Anasthesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin der Charite, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin

TI  - [Forced opioid detoxification under general anesthesia--a new challenge for anesthetists and intensive care physicians] [see comments]

AB  - Treatment of opioid addicts by means of competitive opioid receptor antagonists was developed at the University of Vienna in 1987 by Loimer and co-workers. They compared two withdrawal regimens: The short Opiate withdrawal using a staggered naloxone regimen and the rapid opiate detoxification during general anesthesia by means of high doses of naloxone. Based on the latter concept, various modifications have been developed world-wide using either naloxone or as an alternative, naltrexone, an antagonist available for oral administration only. However, there are considerable objections to opioid detoxification during general anasthesia. The main criticism is based an the supposedly unacceptable high risk:benefit-ratio, the higher costs, the lack of psycho-social support, and the lack of prospective studies. However, first results suggest that rapid detoxification procedures are more successful in decreasing relapse than methods which are based on psychiatric treatment alone. As sympathetic hyperfunction is common in rapid detoxification procedures using high doses of opioid receptor antagonists, it is essential to avoid severe autonomic imbalance with possible subsequent impairment of organ functions. To prevent those disturbances, general anesthesia plays an important role. So far, there is almost no information about such methods in the anesthesiological literature. In this article the clinical relevance of such methods is discussed summarizing both the available literature and our own experience and we conclude that rapid opioid detoxification under general anesthesia is a safe and efficient method to suppress withdrawal symptoms. This treatment may be of benefit in patients who particularly suffer from severe withdrawal symptoms and who have failed repeatedly to complete conventional withdrawal

MH  - administration & dosage

MH  - Anesthesia,General

MH  - Anesthesiology

MH  - Comparative Study

MH  - drug therapy

MH  - English Abstract

MH  - Human

MH  - Intensive Care

MH  - Metabolic Detoxication,Drug

MH  - methods

MH  - Naloxone

MH  - Naltrexone

MH  - Narcotic Antagonists

MH  - Narcotics

MH  - Opioid-Related Disorders

MH  - pharmacokinetics

MH  - Prospective Studies

MH  - Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

MH  - therapeutic use

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 99300803LA - GerRN - 0 (Narcotic Antagonists)RN - 0 (Narcotics)RN - 465-65-6 (Naloxone)PT - JOURNAL ARTICLEPT - REVIEWPT - REVIEW, TUTORIALDA - 19990709IS - 0939-2661SB - MCY - GERMANYJC - A4CAA - AuthorEM - 199909

UR  - PM:0010372215

SO  - Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1999 May ;34(5):261-268

 

6

UI  - 16

AU  - Kienbaum P

AU  - Thurauf N

AU  - Michel MC

AU  - Scherbaum N

AU  - Gastpar M

AU  - Peters J

AD  - Abteilung fur Anasthesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitat GH Essen, Germany. peter.kienbaum@uni-essen.de

TI  - Profound increase in epinephrine concentration in plasma and cardiovascular stimulation after mu-opioid receptor blockade in opioid- addicted patients during barbiturate-induced anesthesia for acute detoxification [see comments]

AB  - BACKGROUND: Acute displacement of opioids from their receptors by administration of large doses of opioid antagonists during general anesthesia is a new approach for detoxification of patients addicted to opioids. The authors tested the hypothesis that mu-opioid receptor blockade by naloxone induces cardiovascular stimulation mediated by the sympathoadrenal system. METHODS: Heart rate, cardiac index, and intravascular pressures were measured in 10 patients addicted to opioids (drug history; mean +/- SD, 71 +/- 51 months) during a program of methadone substitution (96 +/- 57 mg/day). Cardiovascular variables and concentrations of catecholamine in plasma were measured in the awake state, during methohexital-induced anesthesia (dose, 74 +/- 44 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) before administration of naloxone, and repeatedly during the first 3 h of mu-opioid receptor blockade. Naloxone was administered initially in an intravenous dose of 0.4 mg, followed by incremental bolus doses (0.8, 1.6, 3.2, and 6.4 mg) at 15- min intervals until a total dose of 12.4 mg had been administered within 60 min; administration was then continued by infusion (0.8 mg/h). RESULTS: Concentration of epinephrine in plasma increased 30- fold (15 +/- 9 to 458 +/- 304 pg/ml), whereas concentration of norepinephrine in plasma only increased to a minor extent (76 +/- 44 to 226 +/- 58 pg/ml, P < 0.05). Cardiac index increased by 74% (2.7 +/- 0.41 to 4.7 +/- 1.7 min(-1) x m(-2)), because of increases in heart rate (89 +/- 16 to 108 +/- 17 beats/min) and stroke volume (+44%), reaching maximum 45 min after the initial injection of naloxone. In parallel, systemic vascular resistance index decreased (-40%). Systolic arterial pressure significantly increased (113 +/- 16 to 138 +/- 16 mmHg), whereas diastolic arterial pressure did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Despite barbiturate-induced anesthesia, acute mu-opioid receptor blockade in patients addicted to opioids induces profound epinephrine release and cardiovascular stimulation. These data suggest that long- term opioid receptor stimulation changes sympathoadrenal and cardiovascular function, which is acutely unmasked by mu-opioid receptor blockade. Because of the attendant cardiovascular stimulation, acute detoxification using naloxone should be performed by trained anesthesiologists or intensivists

MH  - Adult

MH  - Anesthesia

MH  - Anesthesia,General

MH  - Anesthetics,Intravenous

MH  - antagonists & inhibitors

MH  - blood

MH  - Chromatography,High Pressure Liquid

MH  - drug effects

MH  - drug therapy

MH  - Epinephrine

MH  - Female

MH  - Hemodynamics

MH  - Human

MH  - Infusions,Intravenous

MH  - Male

MH  - Methadone

MH  - methods

MH  - Methohexital

MH  - Naloxone

MH  - Narcotic Antagonists

MH  - Norepinephrine

MH  - Opioid-Related Disorders

MH  - pharmacology

MH  - Receptors,Opioid,mu

MH  - Support,Non-U.S.Gov't

MH  - therapeutic use

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 98266710LA - EngRN - 0 (Anesthetics, Intravenous)RN - 0 (Narcotic Antagonists)RN - 0 (Receptors, Opioid, mu)RN - 18652-93-2 (Methohexital)RN - 465-65-6 (Naloxone)RN - 51-41-2 (Norepinephrine)RN - 51-43-4 (Epinephrine)PT - CLINICAL TRIALPT - JOURNAL ARTICLEDA - 19980616IS - 0003-3022SB - ASB - MCY - UNITED STATESJC - 4SGAA - AuthorEM - 199808RO - M:LC2

UR  - PM:0009605673

SO  - Anesthesiology 1998 May ;88(5):1154-1161

 

7

UI  - 5

AU  - Kienbaum P

AU  - Scherbaum N

AU  - Thurauf N

AU  - Michel MC

AU  - Gastpar M

AU  - Peters J

AD  - Abteilung fur Anasthesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitat GH Essen, Germany

TI  - Acute detoxification of opioid-addicted patients with naloxone during propofol or methohexital anesthesia: a comparison of withdrawal symptoms, neuroendocrine, metabolic, and cardiovascular patterns

AB  - OBJECTIVE: Mu-Opioid receptor blockade during general anesthesia is a new treatment for detoxification of opioid addicted patients. We assessed catecholamine plasma concentrations, oxygen consumption, cardiovascular variables, and withdrawal symptoms after naloxone and tested the hypothesis that variables are influenced by the anesthetic administered during detoxification. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical study. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a university hospital and psychiatric ward. PATIENTS: Twenty-five mono-opioid addicted patients with mild to moderate systemic disease (ASA II classification) in a methadone substitution program. INTERVENTION: General anesthesia with either propofol (129+/-7 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), mean +/- SEM) or methohexital (74+/-14 microg x kg(-1). min(-1)), mu-opioid receptor blockade by naloxone in a stepwise fashion (increasing doses of 0.4 mg, 0.8 mg, 1.6 mg, 3.2 mg, and 6.4 mg at 15 min intervals followed by 0.8 mg x hr(-1) for 24 hrs) and naltrexone 50 mg x day(-1) orally for > or =4 wks. Clonidine was started 180 mins after the first naloxone dose and its infusion rate was individually adjusted to mitigate withdrawal symptoms during weaning and after extubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During propofol and methohexital anesthesia, naloxone induced a 30-fold increase in epinephrine and a significant three-fold increase in norepinephrine plasma concentrations without a significant difference between groups. This increase in catecholamine plasma concentrations was associated with increased oxygen consumption and marked cardiovascular stimulation with both anesthetics, as shown by increased cardiac index, heart rate, and systolic atrial pressure whereas diastolic pressure remained unchanged. Patients receiving propofol could be extubated significantly earlier after discontinuation of the anesthetics. Although the maximum degree of withdrawal symptoms (Short Opioid Withdrawal Scale) on the day after detoxification was similar with both anesthetics, subsequent withdrawal symptoms decreased significantly more rapidly after propofol anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Naloxone treatment, in opioid-addicted patients, induced a marked increase in catecholamine plasma concentrations, metabolism, and cardiovascular stimulation during anesthesia with both propofol and methohexital. Although both anesthetics appear suitable for detoxification treatment, the use of propofol is associated with earlier extubation and, surprisingly, a shortened period of long-term withdrawal symptoms during detoxification

MH  - Adult

MH  - Anesthesia,General

MH  - Anesthetics,Intravenous

MH  - blood

MH  - Catecholamines

MH  - Comparative Study

MH  - drug therapy

MH  - Female

MH  - Human

MH  - Male

MH  - Methadone

MH  - Methohexital

MH  - Middle Age

MH  - Naloxone

MH  - Narcotic Antagonists

MH  - Narcotics

MH  - Opioid-Related Disorders

MH  - Propofol

MH  - Prospective Studies

MH  - rehabilitation

MH  - Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

MH  - Support,Non-U.S.Gov't

MH  - therapeutic use

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 20267265LA - EngRN - 0 (Anesthetics, Intravenous)RN - 0 (Catecholamines)RN - 0 (Narcotic Antagonists)RN - 0 (Narcotics)RN - 18652-93-2 (Methohexital)RN - 2078-54-8 (Propofol)RN - 465-65-6 (Naloxone)RN - 76-99-3 (Methadone)PT - CLINICAL TRIALPT - JOURNAL ARTICLEPT - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALDA - 20000525IS - 0090-3493SB - ASB - MCY - UNITED STATESJC - DTFAA - AuthorEM - 200007

UR  - PM:0010809268

SO  - Crit Care Med 2000 Apr ;28(4):969-976

 

8

UI  - 11

AU  - Kirsner K

AU  - Biddle C

AD  - Anderson Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA

TI  - AANA Journal course: update for nurse anesthetists-accelerated detoxification from opioid addiction under anesthesia: the Midas touch or the emperor's new clothes?

AB  - Opioids are highly addictive substances that include natural and synthetic chemicals that mimic the effects of morphine or bind to morphine receptor sites. Traditional assisted withdrawal is a process that takes several days to weeks and is associated with a host of painful and difficult symptoms. Recently, accelerated detoxification using opioid antagonists administered while the patient is anesthetized has been promoted, with centers proliferating nationwide. Published studies of rapid detoxification under anesthesia are highly variable in quality and control, and long-term outcome data are incomplete. Well- controlled, carefully designed studies are needed to appropriately assess the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the approach

MH  - Anesthesia,General

MH  - drug therapy

MH  - Human

MH  - methods

MH  - Nurse Anesthetists

MH  - nursing

MH  - Opioid-Related Disorders

MH  - Time Factors

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 99417924LA - EngPT - JOURNAL ARTICLEPT - REVIEWPT - REVIEW, TUTORIALDA - 19990929IS - 0094-6354SB - NCY - UNITED STATESJC - 02PAA - AuthorEM - 199912

UR  - PM:0010488300

SO  - AANA J 1999 Jun ;67(3):279-285

 

9

UI  - 7

AU  - Laheij RJ

AU  - Krabbe PF

AU  - de Jong CA

TI  - Rapid heroin detoxification under general anesthesia [letter]

MH  - administration & dosage

MH  - Anesthesia,General

MH  - Heroin Dependence

MH  - Human

MH  - Naltrexone

MH  - Narcotic Antagonists

MH  - rehabilitation

MH  - therapeutic use

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 20166515LA - EngRN - 0 (Narcotic Antagonists)RN - 16590-41-3 (Naltrexone)PT - LETTERDA - 20000309IS - 0098-7484SB - ASB - MSB - XCY - UNITED STATESJC - KFREM - 200005

UR  - PM:0010703775

SO  - JAMA 2000 Mar 1 ;283(9):1143

 

10

UI  - 13

AU  - Peters J

AU  - Kienbaum P

TI  - [Opioid detoxification under anesthesia: new scientific territory or established methods? (editorial; comment)]

MH  - administration & dosage

MH  - Anesthesia,General

MH  - drug therapy

MH  - Human

MH  - Metabolic Detoxication,Drug

MH  - methods

MH  - Narcotic Antagonists

MH  - Narcotics

MH  - Opioid-Related Disorders

MH  - pharmacokinetics

MH  - Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

MH  - Substance-Related Disorders

MH  - therapeutic use

MH  - therapy

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 99300802LA - GerRN - 0 (Narcotic Antagonists)RN - 0 (Narcotics)PT - COMMENTPT - EDITORIALDA - 19990709IS - 0939-2661SB - MCY - GERMANYJC - A4CEM - 199909

UR  - PM:0010372214

SO  - Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1999 May ;34(5):259-260

 

11

UI  - 14

AU  - Pfab R

AU  - Hirtl C

AU  - Zilker T

AD  - Toxikologische Abteilung, Medizinische Klinik, Munchen, West Germany. rudi.pfab@t-online.de

TI  - Opiate detoxification under anesthesia: no apparent benefit but suppression of thyroid hormones and risk of pulmonary and renal failure

AB  - INTRODUCTION: The new technique for opiate detoxification using anesthesia and high, repetitive doses of opiate-antagonists claims to detoxify addicts without withdrawal symptoms within 24-48 hours. We studied the method with 12 opiate addicts (5 L-polamidone, 4 dihydrocodeine, 3 heroin), using general anesthesia and the antagonists naloxone 0.5 mg/kg and naltrexone > 150 mg. Objective and subjective withdrawal symptoms were measured until urine was free of drugs and patients had no withdrawal symptoms. Thyroid hormones were measured before, during, and after the anesthesia period. RESULTS: All patients had moderate to severe opiate withdrawal symptoms. No detoxification was finished within 48 hours. The dihydrocodeine subjects were compared with conventionally detoxified controls; no difference was seen. The method suppressed thyroid hormones TT3, TT4, and TSH. The study was terminated because of side effects: 1 pulmonary failure and 2 renal failures. All patients survived without sequelae. CONCLUSION: There is no obvious benefit from this method, whereas the risks are high

MH  - Adult

MH  - adverse effects

MH  - analogs & derivatives

MH  - Anesthesia

MH  - blood

MH  - Codeine

MH  - etiology

MH  - Female

MH  - Heroin Dependence

MH  - Human

MH  - Kidney Failure,Acute

MH  - Male

MH  - Methadone

MH  - Naloxone

MH  - Naltrexone

MH  - Narcotic Antagonists

MH  - Narcotics

MH  - Opioid-Related Disorders

MH  - physiopathology

MH  - prevention & control

MH  - Respiratory Insufficiency

MH  - Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

MH  - therapeutic use

MH  - therapy

MH  - Thyroid Hormones

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 99177885LA - EngRN - 0 (Narcotic Antagonists)RN - 0 (Narcotics)RN - 0 (Thyroid Hormones)RN - 125-28-0 (dihydrocodeine)RN - 16590-41-3 (Naltrexone)RN - 465-65-6 (Naloxone)RN - 76-57-3 (Codeine)RN - 76-99-3 (Methadone)PT - CLINICAL TRIALPT - JOURNAL ARTICLEDA - 19990330IS - 0731-3810SB - ASB - MCY - UNITED STATESJC - KANAA - AuthorEM - 199906

UR  - PM:0010078159

SO  - J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1999  ;37(1):43-50

 

12

UI  - 22

AU  - Presslich O

AU  - Loimer N

AU  - Lenz K

AU  - Schmid R

AD  - Department of Intensive Care, Psychiatric University Clinic, Vienna, Austria

TI  - Opiate detoxification under general anesthesia by large doses of naloxone

AB  - For opiate detoxification 6 volunteer opiate addicts were intravenously administered 10 mg naloxone within one hour while under barbiturate anesthesia. During administration of naloxone none of the patients demonstrated significant changes in the hemodynamic parameters of heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, peripheral resistance or in the oxygen saturation. After patients awoke from anesthesia, they experienced no or only minimal withdrawal symptoms. Possible explanations for the suppression of withdrawal symptoms are discussed

MH  - administration & dosage

MH  - Adult

MH  - Anesthesia

MH  - Anesthesia,General

MH  - Blood Pressure

MH  - diagnostic use

MH  - drug effects

MH  - Heart Rate

MH  - Human

MH  - Intensive Care

MH  - Male

MH  - Metabolic Detoxication,Drug

MH  - Naloxone

MH  - Opioid-Related Disorders

MH  - Oxygen Consumption

MH  - prevention & control

MH  - Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

MH  - therapeutic use

MH  - Thiopental

MH  - Vascular Resistance

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 90096216LA - EngRN - 465-65-6 (Naloxone)RN - 76-75-5 (Thiopental)PT - JOURNAL ARTICLEDA - 19900208IS - 0731-3810SB - ASB - MCY - UNITED STATESJC - KANAA - AuthorEM - 199004

UR  - PM:0002600989

SO  - J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1989  ;27(4-5):263-270

 

13

UI  - 17

AU  - Solomont JH

TI  - Opiate detoxification under anesthesia [letter; comment]

MH  - Anesthesia

MH  - Human

MH  - Opioid-Related Disorders

MH  - rehabilitation

MH  - standards

MH  - Substance Abuse Treatment Centers

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 98001623LA - EngPT - COMMENTPT - LETTERDA - 19971106IS - 0098-7484SB - ASB - MSB - XCY - UNITED STATESJC - KFREM - 199801RO - M:LC2

UR  - PM:0009343458

SO  - JAMA 1997 Oct 22 ;278(16):1318

 

14

UI  - 21

AU  - Stephenson J

TI  - Experts debate merits of 1-day opiate detoxification under anesthesia [news] [see comments]

MH  - Anesthesia

MH  - Anesthesia,General

MH  - Human

MH  - Naltrexone

MH  - Narcotic Antagonists

MH  - Opioid-Related Disorders

MH  - prevention & control

MH  - rehabilitation

MH  - Substance Abuse Treatment Centers

MH  - Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

MH  - therapeutic use

MH  - trends

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 97163335LA - EngRN - 0 (Narcotic Antagonists)RN - 16590-41-3 (Naltrexone)PT - NEWSDA - 19970213IS - 0098-7484SB - ASB - MSB - XCY - UNITED STATESJC - KFREM - 199704RO - M:LC2

UR  - PM:0009010155

SO  - JAMA 1997 Feb 5 ;277(5):363-364

 

15

UI  - 3

AU  - Streel E

AU  - Bredas P

AU  - Dan B

AU  - Hanak C

AU  - Pelc I

AU  - Verbanck P

AD  - CHU Brugmann (Universite Libre de Bruxelles), Institut de Psychiatrie, Clinique d'Alcoologie & Toxicomanies, Brussels, Belgium. manu.streel@chu-brugmann.be

TI  - Previous anesthesia can temporarily overshadow the expression of a withdrawal syndrome in opiate dependent rats [In Process Citation]

AB  - We hypothesized that induction of opiate antagonist-precipitated withdrawal under anesthesia can decrease the expression of later withdrawal signs. Three groups of morphine-dependent rats were compared in different experimental conditions of withdrawal precipitation using naloxone. We showed that anesthesia can temporarily overshadow the expression of withdrawal signs, but that some signs can be delayed and increased in intensity. This can be explained by a parallel and temporary effect of anesthesia on arousal and pain threshold. This carries important implications on the use of anesthesia in detoxification procedures

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 20555589LA - EngDA - 20001205IS - 0024-3205SB - MSB - XCY - ENGLANDJC - L62AA - AUTHORRO - O:099

UR  - PM:0011106003

SO  - Life Sci 2000 Oct 27 ;67(23):2883-2887

 

16

UI  - 4

AU  - Whittington A

AU  - Collins ED

AU  - Kleber HD

AU  - Gold G

AU  - Cullen DJ

AU  - Gonzales S

AU  - Houtmeyers D

AU  - Dwyer MJ

TI  - Rapid opioid detoxification during general anesthesia: is death not a significant outcome? [In Process Citation]

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 20500789LA - EngDA - 20001109IS - 0003-3022SB - ASB - MCY - UNITED STATESJC - 4SGRO - O:099

UR  - PM:0011046233

SO  - Anesthesiology 2000 Nov ;93(5):1363-1364

 

17

UI  - 6

AU  - Wilson LB

AU  - DeMaria PA

AU  - Kane HL

AU  - Reining KM

AD  - Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA

TI  - Anesthesia-assisted rapid opiate detoxification: a new procedure in the postanesthesia care unit

AB  - Heroin detoxification by anesthesia-assisted rapid opiate detoxification (AAROD) can be achieved in approximately 1 hour using intravenous administration of midazolam, propofol, and naloxone. Opiate dependence and detoxification techniques are reviewed. Important aspects of patient care and perianesthesia nursing are described using a case study. To assist in caring for the patient undergoing anesthesia- assisted rapid opiate detoxification, the perianesthesia nurse should understand the methodology and controversy of this new procedure

MH  - Adult

MH  - Anesthesia,General

MH  - Anesthetics,Intravenous

MH  - Case Report

MH  - drug therapy

MH  - Heroin Dependence

MH  - Human

MH  - Male

MH  - methods

MH  - Midazolam

MH  - Naloxone

MH  - Narcotic Antagonists

MH  - nursing

MH  - Perioperative Care

MH  - Postanesthesia Nursing

MH  - Propofol

MH  - Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

MH  - therapeutic use

RP  - NOT IN FILE

NT  - UI - 20209877LA - EngRN - 0 (Anesthetics, Intravenous)RN - 0 (Narcotic Antagonists)RN - 2078-54-8 (Propofol)RN - 465-65-6 (Naloxone)RN - 59467-70-8 (Midazolam)PT - JOURNAL ARTICLEPT - REVIEWPT - REVIEW, TUTORIALDA - 20000731IS - 1089-9472SB - NCY - UNITED STATESJC - CKXAA - AuthorEM - 200010

UR  - PM:0010745790

SO  - J Perianesth Nurs 1999 Aug ;14(4):207-212