|
Addiction, Pain, and Public Health website
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Dr. Fisher Comments on the Paey Appeal Argued by Mr. Flannery and on PRN's Role in the Case | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
Mr. John Flannery argued Richards case brilliantly, engaging the entire panel of judges in a passionately argued cruel and unusual argument, supplemented by an astonishing record of misconduct by a rogue prosecutor. In three consecutive trials, Mr. Paey's trial was marred by perjured testimony of which the prosecutor was fully aware right from the start. The attorney representing the state of Florida, arguing against Mr. Flannery, came across as less than convincing. He undermined his own position by citing case law that favored Mr. Paey. Linda Paey was present with her three teenagers to support Richard's case. The photographers were all over them, as they conducted themselves with dignity. In summary, this was Pain Relief Network's finest achievement to date. Ms. Reynolds has handed the pain movement another resounding success. Win or lose, the issue took a giant step forward today. [END] | |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||