|
[This Article in
PDF print format]
Dr.
Lyle Craker, a professor of plant and soil sciences at UMass Amherst, has been
trying since 2001 to get a license from the Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) to grow research-grade marijuana for use in Food and Drug
Administration-approved studies of the plant's potential to become a legally
prescribed medicine.
Last December, after more than three years of stonewalling, the DEA officially
rejected his application, holding that his study "would not be consistent with
the public interest." ( See "Up in Smoke," This Just In, December 17, 2004. )
Now
Craker, along with the Belmont-based Multidisciplinary Association for
Psychedelic Studies ( MAPS ) and the ACLU's Drug Law Reform Project, is
challenging that ruling.
Hearings
began in Washington this week before DEA administrative-law judge Mary Ellen
Bittner. Supporters hope the proceedings will end the DEA's obstruction and
remove the federal government's monopoly on research marijuana.
In the
wake of the Raich v. Ashcroft decision in June, in which the Supreme Court
affirmed that federal law supersedes state law in matters of drug enforcement,
FDA approval is really the only avenue left for medical marijuana. Before that
can happen, there must be studies into its safety and efficacy. "We have
considerable lay information about the potential health benefits of this plant
material, but we lack the scientific studies that are necessary to prove the
value of medicine," Craker told the Phoenix in December. "The first step in
that is producing quality plant material that will have bioactive constituents
in it."
But at
the moment, all marijuana used for research in the US comes from a closely
monitored crop maintained by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). The
complainants in the Craker case maintain that the supply is insufficient, and of
inadequate quality, for proper research - let alone for prescription sale should
the FDA ever approve it. Moreover, the feds are stingy in distributing the
plants.
MAPS
president Rick Doblin says that just last week, NIDA refused to provide 10 grams
of marijuana for a MAPS-sponsored vaporizer study at Chemic Labs in Canton.
Last
month, Democratic Massachusetts representatives John Olver and Michael Capuano
sent a letter to DEA administrator Karen Tandy, expressing "strong support" for
issuing Dr. Craker's license and pointing out that NIDA's monopoly makes little
sense since the DEA has licensed privately funded production of other Schedule I
drugs, such as MDMA and LSD. (MAPS has funded studies using independently
produced MDMA and psilocybin. )
"The
government is basically scared of this research," says Doblin, during a break in
testimony. "They want it two ways. They want to say there's not enough
research to make marijuana into a medicine, and they want to block the
research." Still, he feels reasonably confident that the DEA's decision might be
reversed. "My sense is that the judge is fair, she's asking good questions, I
have a lot of respect for the way she's interacted with us so far." Time will
tell if his optimism is well-founded. There will be another week of testimony
toward the end of September, and another ( if need be ) in December, before
Judge Bittner makes a recommendation to the head of the DEA. In the meantime,
Doblin will be commenting nightly on the goings-on in Washington at
http://www.maps.org/weblogs/rick.
[This Article in
PDF print format]
[END]
|