|
[Full
Text of this Article in Adobe PDF format]
About the
Author:
Donna Knox is married to Cecil Knox. A former journalist, Ms. Knox
currently advocates on behalf of missing American servicemen and
practices family law in the Roanoke Valley.
They slung
terms like "house of death," "drug kingpin" and "fraud central." Cecil
Knox waited for them to realize their mistake, but he finally grasped
that U.S. Attorney John Brownlee was not vested in truth. Brownlee
wanted a high-profile case to make him a hero and had chosen "Dr. Knox"
to play the villain.
For four years, Cecil's life has been scorched by Brownlee's devotion
to ego, his propensity for making poor decisions and his disturbing
lack of integrity. It is time to publicly examine this prosecutor who
has the gall to pretend he is serving the public good when he trumps up
charges, brandishes enormous prison sentences and visits financial ruin
upon his targets. It is time to hold Brownlee accountable.
Having launched an offensive against Cecil where none was justified,
Brownlee set about concocting a case. He accused Cecil of intentionally
addicting patients to narcotics to make them return for more; of being
responsible for the death of a patient he hadn't seen in 18 months; of
trading narcotics for drugs many times with a convict who, at trial,
couldn't even identify him.
Cecil is an incredibly dedicated physician. He accepted patients other
doctors couldn't help. He worked all hours, made house calls, and went
well beyond the call to help suffering people. Many of them credit him
with saving their lives.
But Cecil was different, with his long hair and his cowboy boots.
Brownlee tried hard to confuse eccentricity with criminality. His
accusations were preposterous. A genuine investigation would have
revealed that.
Brownlee acted utterly without conscience. His team blatantly
manipulated people and information as they scoured the region for
anything they could twist into evidence. They exemplified the
deplorable mentality that it is better to destroy an innocent man than
to lose a case.
Brownlee stooped to disingenuous press conferences and distortion of
the Medicare billing process to set up fraud, conspiracy and
racketeering charges. He indicted Cecil's staff, terrorizing them with
inexcusable threats. He disregarded the Medical Board's earlier
findings that Cecil's treatments were appropriate. It was a telling
display of over-reaching by a prosecutor without a case.
Few of us stop to consider the imbalance of power in criminal
prosecutions, and how prosecutors can abuse the system to bully
defendants. Using all-too-common tactics, Brownlee froze our assets,
had Cecil's practice closed and deluged him with an attack involving 23
government entities.
But Cecil was determined to fight: for patients' rights to pain relief
and for doctors' rights to answer to medical boards, not to rogue
prosecutors seeking notoriety.
After a brutal eight-week trial, Brownlee was soundly defeated. He
slipped from the courtroom, deprived of the victory speech he had,
undoubtedly, envisioned as a stepping stone to greater professional
heights.
Needing to save face, Brownlee reindicted Cecil, then pushed for a deal
just before the second trial.
Cecil had borrowed more than $1 million and would need another
half-million to proceed. His cancer was in remission, and the trauma of
another trial might've provoked a relapse. He wanted to end the case
for his office manager, whom Brownlee had tormented for refusing to
capitulate.
Reluctantly, Cecil accepted a plea agreement, admitting to relatively
minor misconduct, unrelated to pain medicine, giving Brownlee nothing
he had charged, and foreclosing the threat of prison. The plea was a
legal fiction -- a ransom federal prosecutors often extract, even from
innocent people. It is government coercion that society should not
tolerate.
Brownlee's boastings about Cecil's plea bore little relationship to
reality. He acted as if he had proven his case and brought down a
terrible criminal. After wasting untold millions in taxpayer dollars,
it is Brownlee who should be brought down.
We all lose when a prosecutor, enamored with himself and uninterested
in his obligation to justice, rides roughshod over criminal defendants
in search of personal glory. We can measure Brownlee by his conduct in
the two largest cases of his tenure in Roanoke: Cecil's and that of
Richard Burrow.
In both, Brownlee tried to create flashy crimes where none had been
committed; he painted good, honest men as big-time criminals, setting
in motion the limelight he coveted for himself.
Thankfully, people in our community are not as ignorant as Brownlee
supposed. But, the fact that the ultimate travesty was not occasioned
in these cases should not distract us from the threat to our core
beliefs that Brownlee poses.
Brownlee's attitude of entitlement allows him to subvert the truth,
destroy the lives of innocent people and place his personal ambition
above the public good. This is a man who abuses power; a man who should
not hold public office.
[Full
Text of this Article in Adobe PDF format]
[END]
|